Manhattan DA’s Request for Gag Order in Trump’s Hush Money Trial

Prosecutors have urged the judge overseeing the forthcoming criminal trial of former President Donald Trump in Manhattan to impose a gag order on him. They argue that Trump’s inability to control himself could lead to him inciting his supporters to attack witnesses, jurors, and court staff.

Prosecutors’ Argument

In a comprehensive 330-page court filing, the Manhattan district attorney’s office cited Trump’s history of using social media, speeches, rallies, and public statements to target individuals he perceives as adversaries. They contend that Trump’s actions pose a threat to the integrity of the trial proceedings and could incite further attacks from his followers.

Case Background

The Manhattan district attorney’s case against Trump is the first of four criminal cases scheduled for trial. Trump faces a 34-count grand jury indictment, accusing him of illegally falsifying business documents related to hush-money payments made to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election.

Details of the Gag Order Request

Prosecutors have requested restrictions similar to those upheld in a Washington, DC-based appellate court in a separate criminal case involving Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. They seek to prevent Trump from making statements about witnesses, lawyers, jurors, court staff, and their families.

Concerns About Juror Safety

In addition to the gag order request, prosecutors have filed a motion seeking to keep prospective jurors’ names and identifying information private. They argue that Trump’s history of attacking individuals involved in his cases poses a significant risk of juror harassment and intimidation.

Previous Instances of Attacks

Prosecutors highlighted Trump’s past attacks on individuals connected to his cases, including a recent New York civil trial where he targeted the judge’s principal law clerk. These attacks resulted in waves of antisemitic and sexist threats, leading to the imposition of a gag order by the presiding judge.

Lack of Trust in Trump’s Restraint

Prosecutors assert that Trump has not demonstrated the ability to regulate his impulse to engage in personal attacks when faced with legal challenges. They contend that a gag order is necessary to ensure the fair and orderly adjudication of the case.

In summary, the Manhattan district attorney’s office is seeking a gag order to prevent Trump from making inflammatory statements that could undermine the integrity of the trial and jeopardize the safety of those involved.